Join the Discussion

ForumHave your say at our forum.

Popular Forum Topics

 

Hot Topics!
mod_vvisit_counterToday162
mod_vvisit_counterYesterday1007
mod_vvisit_counterThis week4948
mod_vvisit_counterLast week7123
mod_vvisit_counterThis month17266
mod_vvisit_counterLast month34703
mod_vvisit_counterAll days627862
We have: 4 guests, 8 bots online
Today: May 18, 2012

Mystery of Time Traveller Photograph Remains Unsolved - Updated

For larger image see main body of story. For larger image see main body of story.It's 1941 and a ceremony is underway for the opening of a new bridge at South Fork, British Columbia in Canada. The local journalist snaps a shot of those gathered for the opening - but wait, what's that? Who's that in the crowd? A man who appears completely out of time with the prevailing fashions stands holding a camera, he wears sunglasses which appear distinctly modern, his sense of style seems completely modern. Could he be...a time traveller?

And so the internet debates have raged for several years now. With widespread publication of the image it was hoped that someone would come forward and identify the man, maybe even the man himself would come forward and explain how or why he had such a modern style in the staid 1940's. But alas no such thing has happened. In the arguments circulating the internet very few things are agreed but what is agreed is that after having been examined by photographic experts, the image has not been 'altered' in any way. Further to this - a second image has been found which was a 'long shot' of the event - and the man's head is quite clearly seen in the same position as he stands in this image. Evidence of the fact that he was there, and is not the creation/inclusion of modern image software. The Virtual Museum of Canada now owns the image, but it too is no further forward in identifying the man many see as a 'Time Traveller'. Should anyone have any further information on the possible identity of the individual please contact admin at This e-mail address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it

A Planet Flipside forum discussion on the Time Traveller can be found and joined in with by simply clicking here

 

Is this a photograph of a time traveller? Is this a photograph of a time traveller?

Second time traveller mystery?

This second 'Time Traveler' mystery, on the face of it, has more going for it than the previous one. First let's deal with why 'Time Traveler' appears to be the only plausible explanantion for the woman who appears to be talking on a mobile phone in a scene from a Charlie Chaplin movie from the 1920's.

 

 

 

   

'Mobile phone' does appear to be the only answer. Or does it? One of our staff tracked down images which show 1920's hearing aids. Rather large contraptions there is a microphone attachment which, in terms of size and style, is rather like a mobile phone. There is every possibility the lady was holding it up and speaking into it to test the volume on her hearing aid. Of course it's not proof positive but it would go a long way to explaining this admittedly bizarre scene.

 

Could this be what she is holding?Could this be what she is holding?

 

 

Last Updated (Tuesday, 26 October 2010 12:26)

 

Comments  

 
0 # 2010-10-27 07:12
I guess we all time travelled today since your site has today's date as "Oct. 27th, 2010"!!!
Reply | Reply with quote | Quote
 
 
+1 # 2010-10-27 09:14
LOL - That's because it's published in Australia! We're a day ahead of America!

Ed.
Reply | Reply with quote | Quote
 
 
0 # 2010-10-27 09:01
Okay, I would be more worried about the old guy without eyes... The guy is holding a folding-camera (http://tinyurl.com/33zab5j), he's wearing a cardigan which has been worn ever since the Crimean War and sunglasses perfectly assigned to his time.. Move on and care about the eyeless man!
Reply | Reply with quote | Quote
 
 
0 # 2010-10-28 21:18
Correction: He's wearing a cotton hoodie, which have been actively worn by lumberjacks ever since the gold rush. I'm even wearing one at work when it's cold outside! Just move along and worry about the eye-less man...
Reply | Reply with quote | Quote
 
 
0 # 2010-10-29 00:04
There is no eyeless man on the picture. His eyes are just shut... That's how old people look around 80 when they shut their eyes. And there's nothing wrong with the other one either. Hell, they had Batman and Superman in the '40... is there anything wrong with the letter M on his shirt? These time traveler things smell pretty fake or poorly documented to me.
Reply | Reply with quote | Quote
 
 
0 # 2010-10-29 01:28
It was meant as joke. Off course he's not eye-less, it's just as obvious as the time traveller. I'm more than certain that time
travel haven't, and won't, exist. There's nothing wrong with the photograph, it's just extremely poorly researched and a
total waste of time - as with all other paranormal and other happenings. You got my point although, somehow! Thanks.
Reply | Reply with quote | Quote
 
 
0 # 2010-10-29 10:42
Quote:
There's nothing wrong with the photograph, it's just extremely poorly researched and a
total waste of time - as with all other paranormal and other happenings.


Now there's an open mind if I ever heard one! The image has been viewed by over 3 million people worldwide, the clothing has been researched extensively and whilst most of it was available at the time there's a problem with the font used on the t-shirt. The Sunglasses tend towards 'welders' glasses (which might make sense if he worked in the building of the bridge - but this still leaves issues with why his clothing is not traditional welders clothing for the period). The camera has been researched extensively and of course the image itself by professional analysts. Does that sound like 'extremely poorly researched' to you? I would applaud you had you made some telling reference which would in fact reveal something which undermines the possibility of it being a 'time traveler' - but as your quote above shows - there was never really any intention to view the evidence was there?

Ed.
Reply | Reply with quote | Quote
 
 
0 # 2010-10-30 06:53
If she's using that carbon hearing aid, why would she need to hold the black box to her ear? There's already an ear piece to place in her ear. Perhaps the black box is used to control volume but, again, why hold that to her ear? I don't think that's what it is but it sure isn't a cell phone.
Reply | Reply with quote | Quote
 
 
-1 # 2010-10-30 07:17
You're quite right Brett - why would she need to put it to her ear? All I can think of is that she/he was trying in a way to be discreet? If that doesn't explain it then yes we're back to square one again and the thought that it is a mobile phone.

Ed
Reply | Reply with quote | Quote
 
 
0 # 2010-10-31 11:04
It could be that vacuum tube hearing aid did not have an earpiece. That big handheld she has may be the hearing piece, like the receiver of a 20s era telephone. In the museum photo posted here, that little black circular bit at the far right on the wire may not be an earpiece.
Reply | Reply with quote | Quote
 
 
0 # 2010-11-02 16:24
nice one
Reply | Reply with quote | Quote
 
 
0 # 2010-11-02 16:25
but it is kinda weired and scary dat sumone can time travel but it is possible for it to only be a handphone?
Reply | Reply with quote | Quote
 
 
0 # Luminate 2012-04-20 07:41
Can anyone say photoshop??? And the video doesn't have any remote proof that it's a cell phone I viewed it 30 times enhanced it and slowed it down.... No proof... Your site entertains me and you research is hands down great but at far as this topic goes... Fail... TIME TRAVEL?!?!?!?!? Really guys?!?
Reply | Reply with quote | Quote
 

Add comment


Security code
Refresh

Follow us on Twitter

Sponsors
Recommended Reading

 

 

tarot